10 Common Myths

1. My accountant probably did one.

Unless your accountant acted prior to May 13, 1996 when the tax laws changed, then you are probably depreciating your assets incorrectly.  In the case of purchased buildings, if you do not have a specific appraiser’s report or a professional who has construction cost estimating expertise using national industry costing manuals such as RS Means or Marshall and Swift breaking out the various building components, then you definitely did not have a Cost Segregation Study performed on the building.



2. A Cost Segregation study won’t save any money.

This is true only if the entity or pass thru entity is losing money and has no ability to either carry back or carry forward the losses generated.  Otherwise, the savings generally range from 28% to 35%* of the additional depreciation generated from the study.  For example, if a Cost Segregation Study results in additional depreciation of $1,000,000, then a taxpayer in the 35% tax bracket would save $350,000 in federal income taxes over five years. 



3. We don’t have any assets to reclassify.

With rare exception, every building will have at least 5% to 8% of the interior qualify to be reclassified to 5-year depreciation as well as 5% to 8% of the exterior land improvements qualify to be reclassified to 15-year depreciation. However, most buildings will realize 10% to 15% or more of the interior to be reclassified to 5-year, with many surpassing 30%, and the land improvements to be 10% to 15% reclassified to 15-year. 

Back to Top



4. Our chances of being audited will increase.

Not according to the IRS.  You are filing an automatic change in accounting method which the IRS has pre-approved assuming the form is filed correctly.  In addition, the IRS has issued a publication to follow in order to properly record the changes in depreciable lives.  Keep in mind that you are going from an incorrect method of depreciation to a correct method and the changes made are generally black and white issues within the tax code. 

Back to Top



5. There is no support if the IRS does perform an audit.

There are over 220 IRS rulings, procedures and court cases which allow for Cost Segregation Studies.  The report we provide details out every change with applicable support and documentation.  Our firm's engineers and tax professionals have spent over 1,000 hours on researching Cost Segregation Studies and performed thousands of such studies. 

Back to Top



6. We will get the deduction in the future anyway.

Yes this is true, but a Cost Segregation Study in effect gives you an interest free loan from the government for the first 15 years which you will then repay interest free over the remaining 25 years.  Who do you want holding your money?  There are also advantages to doing a study if the building is going to be sold or upon the death of a building owner.

Back to Top



7. The Cost Segregation Study will put us in an alternative minimum tax (AMT) situation.

Congratulations!  You are probably flush with cash.  If this does occur, the savings will be at the 28% federal tax rate not 35%.  Of course the amounts are large enough so it shouldn’t matter.  In addition, the AMT taxes can be used against regular taxes in future years.

Back to Top



8. My CPA has segregated percentages of construction costs based on invoices or contractor applications for payment, so our company is already benefiting.

Without the contractor/engineer expertise coupled with the tax law guidance, there will likely be valuable tax benefits left on the table.  More importantly, this methodology will not withstand IRS scrutiny. Again, remember, Segregation Holding LLC guarantees a minimum of 500% ROI fee to tax savings on all Cost Segregation Studies engaged above $500,000 in asset cost.

Back to Top



9. A Cost Segregation Study will complicate estate planning.

Yes it might, but the rewards of performing a study have great financial benefits if the owner of the building dies before the building is fully depreciated.  Due to the “step-up in basis” rules, it is one of the rare times a taxpayer can “have his cake and eat it too.”  If done properly, a Cost Segregation Study is an estate planning home run.

Back to Top



10. There is no negative impact to NOT performing a Cost Segregation Study.

This is an incorrect assumption. IRS regulations require that a taxpayer compute depreciation on what is allowed or allowable. Therefore, if you improperly depreciate a 7-year asset over 39 years, the IRS could disallow the depreciation on the asset beginning in year 8. In addition, if the building is sold, the IRS could increase the gain by reducing the basis in the building by the depreciation that should have been taken in prior years, but was not. Again, consult your tax professional for independent verification.

Back to Top